TREATING SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST
When treating sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), manual pulse palpation is today the gold standard to detect the presence or absence of blood flow, but has severe limitations and is neither a rapid nor a reliable method (Germanoska et al. 2018, Eberle et al. 1996). In a study, 45% of healthcare workers could not detect a central pulse during cardiac arrest accurately (Moule 2000, Nakagawa et al. 2010). If circulation is already restored, chest compressions are unnecessary and may do more harm than good. Consequently, there is a clinical need for an easy-to-use tool to assess blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
​
Cardiac arrest is estimated to result in 7-8 million deaths per year and is the third leading cause of death in industrialised countries. Despite improved resuscitation techniques and post resuscitation care, survival following cardiac arrest is only 10% or less, and survival dramatically decreases for every minute that passes without advanced cardiac life support (OECD 2017).
MEDICAL NEED
Successful resuscitation after cardiac arrest requires restoring normal electrical activity in the heart and adequate blood flow to vital organs. Presently, only information about the heart´s electrical activity (electrocardiogram [ECG]), but not blood flow is available during resuscitation.
​
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) consists of chest compressions and artificial ventilation to maintain circulatory flow and oxygenation. If the cardiac rhythm is shockable, an electrical current is delivered to the heart by a defibrillator. Automated external defibrillators can diagnose life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias by interpreting the ECG, enabling untrained laypersons or bystanders to use them successfully. Although defibrillators can detect, treat, and give feedback on the reappearance of normal cardiac rhythm, crucial feedback regarding the successful restoration of blood flow (return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC]) is missing. Shorter time to ROSC is associated with better long-term survival.
Non-shockable rhythms (pulseless electrical activity [PEA] and asystole) are increasingly encountered. Studies show that as many as 60% of the subjects with suspected PEA and 10-35% of those with suspected asystole had mechanical cardiac activity (Deakin 2000, Gaspariet al. 2016). The use of cardiac ultrasound altered the management in 78% of the cases and was associated with increased survival. The European Resuscitation Council guidelines recommend a maximum of 10 seconds interruption to check the pulse during CPR (Perkins et al. 2021). However, cardiac ultrasound cannot be performed during chest compressions and the use is therefore limited (Zengin et al. 2018).
Doppler measurements of blood flow of the carotid artery can be performed without interrupting resuscitation, making it an attractive alternative for haemodynamically guided and personalised treatment. An ultrasound Doppler-system has been developed that continuously measures blood flow in the carotid artery
Time Line
July 2024 -
September 2023 - May 2024
July 2022 - July 2023
January 2022 - January 2023
2019
Multi center trial begins
Pilot study
Funding from Norwegian research council, Approval from Regional Ethics Committee and Norwegian Medical Products Council
Experimental animal study
Idea forms and system developement starts